Skip to content

Fuziah Salleh: Lynas practising double standards in Malaysia and making use of “lax environmental laws” unlike those enforced in Australia

May 25, 2011
Don’t practice double standards, MP tells Lynas
May 24, 11 8:01pm
The expert panel engaged to study the proposed rare earth processing facility Lynas Advanced Material Plant (LAMP) in Gebeng, Pahang must ensure that nothing less than International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety standards are practised.NONEIn a statement today, Kuantan PKR MP Fuziah Salleh (left) accused LAMP of practising double standards in Malaysia and making use of “lax environmental laws” unlike those enforced in Australia.She said LAMP could have applied to build its refinery by following standards set in China instead of the IAEA’s.

Fuziah’s concerns over Lynas’ safety compliance were over the latter’s first proposal to build the rare-earth refinery in Kemaman, Terengganu in 2007 where the company had quoted safety standards practised in China.

She suspects that the same proposal from 2007 was forwarded for Kuantan and it quoted a “limit of 74 Bq/g for the waste to be categorised as non radioactive waste”.

“We can compare and contrast here that the difference is 70 times. It goes further to strengthen my argument that Lynas is using different standards in Australia and different standards in Malaysia.

“Malaysians, especially the people of Kuantan, have a right to know whether the standards to be used are going to be China standards or Australian standards or IAEA standards?”

Lynas given approval in 3 weeks despite high risk

Fuziah cited several documents from the Western Australia Department of Environment and Conservation which had given work approval to the Lynas Rare Earth Concentration Plant in Mount Weld.

NONEAccording to the work approval document dated April 1, the Australian firm exceeded it’s “limit of 1 Bq/g set for non-radioactive tailings” or exceeded the limits allowed for non-significant radioactive waste.

“The environmental assessment report that accompanied the Amendment to the Work Approval also mentioned that Lynas needs to increase the impermeability of the lining of their storage facility and that Lynas has not complied to the original requirements as in the original Works Approval, thus Lynas has to make an additional lining in order to decrease the permeability of the tailing storage facility,” said Fuziah.

azlanShe regretted that despite the complexity of the LAMP project, the Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) had not considered a Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA) for the project.

Fuziah also reprimanded Kuantan’s Department of Environment for approving LAMP’s high-risk project within three weeks in 2008.

“This goes to strengthen my argument that the Malaysian government does not have the capacity to monitor the enforcement on the safety of the industry in which LAMP is involved,” said Fuziah.

IAEA’s responsibility to 700,000 citizens

“The (IAEA) panel members may be pro-nuclear in their personal capacity, however they must remember that their role is to be a regulator and not to be a promoter in this particular task in Kuantan,” she said, urging the panel to strictly adhere to IAEA safety codes.

“The Kuantan and Kemaman citizens, 700,000 in total, within the 30km radius of LAMP will be watching. They, the panel must also remember that they must first be answerable to the public, rather than to the government that appoints them,” she added.

Lynas has invested some RM700 million to build the plant in Kuantan, which they intend to complete and begin test runs by September this year.

NONEThe project, however, has met strong protests from locals and opposition politicians, who claim that the plant will turn Gebeng and nearby Kuantan into a second Bukit Merah.

The Bukit Merah fiasco in Perak took place in the 1980s and early 1990s, when Japanese company Mitsubishi Chemical ran its Asian Rare Earth (ARE) factory which processed tin tailings to extract rare earth compounds.

The company’s failure to manage the radioactive waste produced by ARE’s operations however created what is now arguably Asia’s largest radioactive waste clean-up.

The radiation from the factory’s operations is blamed for scores of deaths in nearby villages due to various illnesses, particularly leukaemia.

One Comment leave one →
  1. ThomasT permalink
    May 25, 2011 9:00 AM

    Whatever is considered safe by Atomic Energy Experts does NOT include ACCIDENTS, Accidents happen. Chernobyl was an accident, human error. Docs. estimate over 1 million dead from that one! The UN, naturally disagrees. Fukushima was an accident, act of nature. Accidntalal leaks happened at 3 Mile Island, US, Sellafied, UK, and at various Nuke plants France and Germany.

    Millions of tons of radioactive thorium 232, with a life of 14 billion years(!!!) will be transported as ores and waste. No accidents? Guaranteed??

    Also..

    China’s rare earth industry each year produces more than five times the amount of waste gas, including deadly fluorine and sulfur dioxide, than the total flared annually by all miners and oil refiners in the U.S. Alongside that 13 billion cubic meters of gas comes 25 million tons of waste water laced with cancer-causing heavy metals such as cadmium.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: